I’ve been trying to reply to Chris Wright regarding his guest column over at Fleen, but there’s an overactive spam filter suddenly keeping me from posting.
So Chris, here’s my latest reply:
Chris said: “Tim, what I’m saying is that the web is designed in a way that works against for-profit publishing.â€
And again, I point you to all kinds of blogs who are making a living doing just that, and to talkingpointsmemo.com who actually has a staff and enough to even fund an internship.
The web in the past wasn’t designed with anything in mind other than to share information between academics. Hell, they didn’t even have webpages in the beginning.
Obviously, it’s now way beyond that original purpose and people are making money on the web and some by being publishers. So, I’m not going to address this anymore.
However, that it’s difficult is besides the point. Most new brick-and-mortar stores fail the first year – going into a new business is hard, and that’s not peculiar to the web. That it’s difficult for an individual cartoonist to make money from their product isn’t new either. It has ALWAYS been difficult.
Actually, I would venture a guess that MORE cartoonists are making cartoons now thanks to the internet, and many of those cartoonists are making some amount of money than before, because now they can just post their work on the web instead of making minis and paying to schlep them to conventions. The web has expanded their potential audience and things like ProjectWonderful has given them the opportunity to earn money from the audience they have.
I think we’re in agreement about this.
What I don’t think we’re going to agree on is your statement about “justcartoonists” vs “professional webcartoonists” vs “amateur webcartoonists.” I don’t believe webcartoonists who are trying to make money think that they’re being undermined by webcartoonists who aren’t trying to.
There may be someone out there who actually thinks that, but I don’t think it’s out there in sufficient numbers to give any credence to the idea.
And any print cartoonist who casts a jaded eye toward the web is doing so not because of webcartoonists, it’s because they’re at a point in their life where they need a business model that will pay their bills. Giving it away for free is not practical. But that just means they haven’t found a way to enter the internet market – and they will.
Seriously, I think the worm has turned and if a new webcartoonist gets past their first year of posting online, those webcartoonists are going to think about ways to profit from their hard work.
The rise of things like ProjectWonderful shows that.
I understand that you think the entire essay is only about publishing, but it’s not. While you discuss how the internet has opened up avenues for individuals to find an audience (which, really, is old news), you’ve also set up what I think is a false tension between people who feel their work is more than a hobby and those who wish to keep it a hobby. Plus you’ve lumped every print cartoonist together into one group – one that is suspicious and hostile to the opportunities provided by the web.
That’s not the attitude I’ve encountered.
The web has upset traditional comics publishing. It has broken up the bottleneck of corporate comics and allowed more people to reach potential readers than ever before.
But it doesn’t automatically follow that the internet is also a barrier to earning a living for these individuals. Some are finding business models that are successful and making money, and others are continuing to pursue their goals.
Those are just the facts, and it’s not my fault that the facts are running counter to your premise.
Thanks for reading.